More on modelling rivers
I've been writing a lot about politics recently — and with reason. But now it's time to be getting back to writing about software, and, specifically, about river flows again.
I wrote almost a year ago that I had had the first glimmer of success with modelling river flows. Well, some success was right, but not enough success. I didn't have a software framework in which I could model other things I wanted to model in my world, nor one with which I could play flexibly. I also — because I was working with maps of my fictional world, and not the real world — couldn't assess how well my algorithms were working, particularly as I had persistent diagonal artefacts.
Parliamentary Questions
Sir Thomas sat then for the constituency of Linlithgow, in West Lothian, in Scotland; his constituents' education was — then as now — governed by the Scottish Parliament at Holyrood. And thus he answered his own West Lothian Question, which has dogged the British constitutional settlement ever since it was first asked, and which has an added frisson in the aftermath of Scotland's failed velvet revolution.
What is being proposed now by David Cameron, is a parliament — the Westminster parliament — which will continue to debate both bills affecting the whole United Kingdom and also bills affecting England only; but with the quirk that Welsh, Northern Irish and Scots MPs will be unable to vote on the English-only bills. This looks, on the face of it, sensible.
A Bill anent Wrongfully Enclosed Common Lands
*Right, we've lost the referendum, we won't get independence. It's time to move on. *
**
Jock Tamson's Bairns
So, we lost.
The important thing to remember is that we all lost, every one of us in Scotland. All Jock Tamsons's bairns, those who voted 'no' just as much as we who voted 'yes'. All of our futures are dimmed, all of our hopes of comfort and prosperity diminished, all of our security eroded. And we are luckier than they. Not for us the slow dawning realisation of how dreadfully, how catastrophically they have erred.
When the value of their homes collapses and they are in negative equity, they will know — for they knew that the United Kingdom government was promoting yet another unsustainable housing bubble — they will know they voted for that.
Is a currency union with fUK worth £126 Billion?
Bear with me folks, I'm just thinking aloud. Address it as such.
UK debt is £1.4Tn; the cost of servicing that is £50Bn per year.
Scotland's population share of the debt — if we do the deal that seems to be proposed, of a population share of debt in return for a population share of assets, with the pound Sterling explicitly counted as an asset — is £126Bn. So if we got the same interest rate as the UK gets now, our servicing cost would be £4.5Bn per year, but we'd probably get less good terms so it would be a bit higher — say £5Bn.